Psychological testing in custody cases is a mandatory exercise to ensure that the kid is left in the hands of the best parent since both of them will ensure to have them to themselves and may go to extra miles to make this a reality. Since a marriage separation in most cases does not end up well, the attorney dealing with the child issue must depend on psychological testing child custody before coming up with a ruling.
Over the years, the sole goal of having a custody case is to ensure the kid has the right parent for their growth as mentioned earlier. This will then ensure that the kid grows perfectly where they will see their personal, emotional and psychological growth without any kinds of disruptions.
The previous life the kid had in the hands of both parents is the pivot of the working of this evaluation. If they were with a parent who was never caring, was abusive or hostile to their kid the test can be able to reflect it. On the other hand, a good parenting comprising of good care and love will also be shown by the test.
The evaluation is diverse enough to ensure the results obtained are inclusive. This is why both parents and the kids have to undergo this test. Its good results make it the only test approached for the longest time in history. It has a scientific approach making it free from any kid of biases. If this happens, there are the measures that are normally kept in place to handle it.
The evaluation can be done in some ways, but interviewing and observations are the commonest and easiest. Observations include watching what the parents do on their daily basis even when around them. Interviewing includes a series of questions that the parents and the kid have to answer but at different times and their responses recorded.
Despite being a good way of ensuring the safety, well-being and best interest of these kids, this kind of testing has never fallen short of being criticized. To begin with, there is the aspect of a validity of the results especially from the answers given by the parents during interviews. One may end up neglecting the truth so that they have the kids by their sides.
More so, there is no scientific proven correlation between a parents social life and their parenting skills. If it exists, it is not always a guarantee. A parent may have a poor social life like a smoking addiction or even a past criminal record which makes them appear to lack parenting skills which they may be having. On the other hand, a person with an exemplary social life may be having the worst parenting ability.
There are instances where the custody is given wrongfully only because the two parties share a diverged social, cultural background which has a direct bearing on how a kid should be punished. How it is done in one society may be different from the looks of the other. In the event the attorney shares the same with either of the parents, the custody may favor one side. However, if the shortcomings can be handled well, then it can still be reliable.
Over the years, the sole goal of having a custody case is to ensure the kid has the right parent for their growth as mentioned earlier. This will then ensure that the kid grows perfectly where they will see their personal, emotional and psychological growth without any kinds of disruptions.
The previous life the kid had in the hands of both parents is the pivot of the working of this evaluation. If they were with a parent who was never caring, was abusive or hostile to their kid the test can be able to reflect it. On the other hand, a good parenting comprising of good care and love will also be shown by the test.
The evaluation is diverse enough to ensure the results obtained are inclusive. This is why both parents and the kids have to undergo this test. Its good results make it the only test approached for the longest time in history. It has a scientific approach making it free from any kid of biases. If this happens, there are the measures that are normally kept in place to handle it.
The evaluation can be done in some ways, but interviewing and observations are the commonest and easiest. Observations include watching what the parents do on their daily basis even when around them. Interviewing includes a series of questions that the parents and the kid have to answer but at different times and their responses recorded.
Despite being a good way of ensuring the safety, well-being and best interest of these kids, this kind of testing has never fallen short of being criticized. To begin with, there is the aspect of a validity of the results especially from the answers given by the parents during interviews. One may end up neglecting the truth so that they have the kids by their sides.
More so, there is no scientific proven correlation between a parents social life and their parenting skills. If it exists, it is not always a guarantee. A parent may have a poor social life like a smoking addiction or even a past criminal record which makes them appear to lack parenting skills which they may be having. On the other hand, a person with an exemplary social life may be having the worst parenting ability.
There are instances where the custody is given wrongfully only because the two parties share a diverged social, cultural background which has a direct bearing on how a kid should be punished. How it is done in one society may be different from the looks of the other. In the event the attorney shares the same with either of the parents, the custody may favor one side. However, if the shortcomings can be handled well, then it can still be reliable.
About the Author:
To find out more about psychological testing child custody cases, visit this qualified doctor's website now. The following homepage contains all the facts at http://drjamesrflens.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment